Does the Fed Need to Cut Now? Bitcoin Crumbles Back Below $113K After ISM Services PMI

Adding to the shocking downward jobs growth revisions on Friday — which sent crypto prices tumbling — the ISM Services PMI all of a sudden is beginning to consistently indicate softer-than-thought economic activity.

The ISM Services for July came in at 50.1, sizably lower than the 51.5 expected. A number above 50 indicates economic expansion, and below that level contraction.

The soft print is notable as it’s now a three-month pattern of weakness, with May’s number having been 49.9 and June’s 50.8 — a big slowdown from previous months.

Compounding that sign of economic weakness was a stagflationary signal embedded in the report, the Prices Paid subindex, which shot up to a cycle high of 69.9.

“Tariffs are causing additional costs as we continue to purchase equipment and supplies … the cost is significant enough that we are postponing other projects to accommodate these cost changes,” read one comment from the report.

Neither crypto nor traditional markets took kindly to the Tuesday data, with bitcoin (BTC) pulling back from above $114,000 to $112,800, lower by nearly 2% over the past 24 hours. The Nasdaq reversed from earlier gains to a 0.5% loss.

Fed cut now?

“The data always suffers big revisions when the economy is at an inflection point, like a recession,” wrote economist Mark Zandi after the big downward jobs revisions Friday.

“The economy is on the precipice of recession,” he continued. “Consumer spending has flatlined, construction and manufacturing are contracting, and employment is set to fall. With inflation on the rise, it’s tough for the Fed to come to the rescue.”

Longtime managers at Hoisington Investment Management, Lacy Hunt and Van Hoisington aren’t so sure the Fed can wait. Calling inflation gains from tariffs temporary and a first-round effect, Hunt and Hoisington say the second, third and later round contractionary effects are of far more import.

“The Fed needs to be quickly moving to an accommodative policy,” they concluded. “The Fed will be ill advised to wait … The far more critical consideration is the coming contraction in global economic activity.”