Bitcoin is up 3.02% in the last 24 hours

Browse through the current market rates for various cryptocurrencies from your dashboard.

Bitmap Copy 3
Bitcoin

BTC

$91,973.96

-0.15% 1h

noun-5629767
Max Supply
21,000,000
noun-3235386
Circulating Supply
19,959,265
noun-7899443
Volume

24h

$55,276,548,784.06

59.10% 1h

Shape
Market Dominance
58.69%
Shape
Price Change 90D
-18.59%

Ripple Exec on Why XRP Ledger Is ‘Uniquely Suited’ for Real World Asset Tokenization

Ripple Senior Vice President Markus Infanger, the head of RippleX, argues the XRP Ledger (XRPL) is built for the next phase of real-world-asset tokenization and says today’s SPV-heavy market is only a bridge to “native issuance.”

From immobilization to native issuance

In an Aug. 12 blog post, Infanger draws a direct line from the 1970s shift in capital markets — when Euroclear and DTCC immobilized paper certificates in vaults while moving ownership records to be electronic — to today’s tokenization stack.

He says Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) play a comparable, transitional role now: legally familiar wrappers that hold the off-ledger asset while issuing a tokenized representation on a network.

The model is “clunky” and centralized, he acknowledges, but useful as infrastructure, standards and policy mature. It is, in his words, scaffolding,” not the end state.

Infanger says the ultimate goal is fully digital assets where the token itself is the legal record, rules are built into the code, trades settle instantly and liquidity flows freely across markets without middlemen.

Why Infanger says XRPL stands out

Infanger’s case for XRPL centers on protocol-level capabilities intended for financial use from the outset, which he argues reduce integration work and operational risk for institutions moving from SPVs toward native issuance:

  • On-ledger exchange (built-in DEX): XRPL includes a native order-book exchange, allowing issued tokens to trade directly on the ledger without external smart-contract routers. For tokenized RWAs, that can mean immediate listing and peer-to-peer execution with fewer moving parts.
  • Near-instant, low-cost settlement: The ledger’s consensus design targets fast finality and minimal transaction fees, a combination Infanger says is critical for high-volume instruments — such as tokenized T-bills — where carry, fees and operational latency matter.
  • XLS-30 automated market maker (AMM): This standard introduces on-ledger liquidity pools that algorithmically set prices based on inventory, so tokens can trade even when a matching order isn’t present. For RWA markets that need continuous two-way prices — rather than episodic RFQs — on-ledger AMMs can help stabilize liquidity.
  • XLS-65 lending vaults: A proposed standard for protocol-level borrowing and lending. Instead of building bespoke smart contracts, issuers could enable secured credit (for example, borrowing against a tokenized note or real-estate claim) with rules defined at the standard level, aiding auditability and risk controls.
  • Programmable compliance and custody hooks: Because issuance, exchange, and settlement live in the base protocol, Infanger argues that rule sets (whitelists, transfer restrictions, disclosures) and custody workflows can be embedded directly into asset lifecycles — supporting regulatory alignment as volumes scale.
  • Composability: With exchange, liquidity, lending and issuance primitives designed to interoperate, tokens can move through primary issuance, secondary trading, collateralization and settlement without stitching together multiple external systems. Infanger says that’s the path to “embedded” liquidity rather than fragmented silos.

Early signs of native issuance

To illustrate the direction of travel, Infanger cites a pilot by Ctrl Alt with Dubai’s land regulator to mint property ownership records on XRPL. By recording titles natively, the scheme aims to streamline transfers, improve auditability and embed supervisory visibility.

Ctrl Alt also plans to integrate Ripple Custody for secure storage of tokenized deeds— an example of how ledger-level functionality and institutional-grade custody can be paired in production.

Why SPVs aren’t going away — yet

Infanger says SPVs remain vital for institutions bound by current laws, audits, and system tests, comparing them to 1970s immobilization that paved the way for digitization and, eventually, fully digital assets with built-in compliance and settlement.

The pitch to institutions

Infanger urges banks, asset managers, and treasurers to use SPVs for now but plan for native issuance. He believes a public, finance-focused ledger with built-in exchange, liquidity and credit standards will speed the shift and make on-ledger assets work like mainstream instruments.

Related Posts

Robert Kiyosaki Says ‘Bye Bye US Dollar’—Warns Hyperinflation May Wipe You out

Robert Kiyosaki escalates his alarm over the weakening U.S. dollar and widening wealth pressures, urging Americans to brace...

Ripple CEO Targets Bitcoin $180K as Binance Chief Sees ‘Stronger’ BTC Ahead

Bitcoin’s projected climb gained fresh momentum as Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse and Binance CEO Richard Teng voiced bullish...

Bitcoin ETFs Rebound to Inflows as Ether Outflows Deepen

Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) snapped back into positive territory with healthy inflows, while ether ETFs logged another day...

Join the Newsletter

noun-7811267

Strong AES 256-bit encryption

noun-7335232

Operating since 2023

noun-7776734

24/7 dedicated client care

Copyright © 2025 by Sable Venture Capital Inc. | All Rights Reserved